【肖申克的救赎1994】 (Part 1) | 肖申克的救贖線上看

【肖申克的救赎1994】 (Part 1)


In addition to reading this article, you can also view other useful information. We offer more here: View more

【肖申克的救赎1994】 (Part 1)

因太恶心,首映式一半人退场!变态杀人狂,用人体盖房子,让人呕吐的惊悚文艺片,拉斯·冯·提尔代表作!


《此房是我造》

因太恶心,首映式一半人退场!变态杀人狂,用人体盖房子,让人呕吐的惊悚文艺片,拉斯·冯·提尔代表作!

《肖申克的救赎》:人类全部的智慧就包含在两个词中“希望”和“等待”|“伟大的电影”经典影片解读02


电影《肖申克的救赎》改编自美国,著名作家斯蒂芬·金的小说《丽塔·海华丝和肖申克的救赎》,是《四季奇谭》中的一篇故事。在1994年刚上映时口碑尚可,但票房凄惨勉强回本,摩根·弗里曼就曾在采访时多次表示,电影的片名容易让人提不起兴趣,没人知道什么是“肖申克”,而救赎又带有某种宗教意味,似乎暗示影片道德说教的倾向。
随着家庭录像机以及后来互联网的普及,逐渐被全球众多的影迷所认可。人们不厌其烦地讨论着影片中的希望与自由,讨论着安迪身上散发的奇艺光辉,如同导演达拉邦特所说的那样,电影上映后他收到很多来信,感谢这部作品在人生低潮时,带来鼓舞人心的激励和感动。
肖申克的救赎伟大的电影张馆长TheShawshankRedemption

《肖申克的救赎》:人类全部的智慧就包含在两个词中“希望”和“等待”|“伟大的电影”经典影片解读02

带你发现《肖申克的救赎》中的隐形彩蛋!


要么忙着求生 要么忙着去死 谁能摆脱体制化的禁锢 导演对原著一个不易觉察的细节改编 引发我们的深刻思考

带你发现《肖申克的救赎》中的隐形彩蛋!

Shawshank Redemption – Andy Escapes


FAIR USE DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. 
Nonprofit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. 
One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords.  This right is subject to certain limitations found in sections 107 through 118 of the copyright law (title 17, U.S. Code).  One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of “fairn use”.  The doctrine of fair use has developed through a substantial number of court decisions over the years and has been codified in section 107 of the copyright law. 
Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.  Section 107 also sets out in four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair: 
1. The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
2. The nature of the copyrighted work
3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
The distinction between fair use and infringement may be unclear and not easily defined. There is no specific number of words, lines, or notes that may safely be taken without permission. Acknowledging the source of the copyrighted material does not substitute for obtaining permission.
The 1961 Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the U.S. Copyright Law cites examples of activities that courts have regarded as fair use: “quotation of excerpts in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment; quotation of short passages in a scholarly or technical work, for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations; use in a parody of some of the content of the work parodied; summary of an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report; reproduction by a library of a portion of a work to replace part of a damaged copy; reproduction by a teacher or student of a small part of a work to illustrate a lesson; reproduction of a work in legislative or judicial proceedings or reports; incidental and fortuitous reproduction, in a newsreel or broadcast, of a work located in the scene of an event being reported.”
Copyright protects the particular way an author has expressed himself. It does not extend to any ideas, systems, or factual information conveyed in the work.
The safest course is always to get permission from the copyright owner before using copyrighted material. The Copyright Office cannot give this permission.
When it is impracticable to obtain permission, use of copyrighted material should be avoided unless the doctrine of fair use would clearly apply to the situation. The Copyright Office can neither determine if a certain use may be considered fair nor advise on possible copyright violations. If there is any doubt, it is advisable to consult an attorney.

Shawshank Redemption - Andy Escapes

In addition to viewing this topic, you can also access many other great comments here: View more classified articlesMusic video

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *