Nikon Z 85mm vs 105mm vs 70-200mm | Who WINS? – S CLASS Battle Royal | Matt Irwin | 你可以在这里看到更多更新的歌词
[penci_button link=”#” icon=”” icon_position=”left” text_color=”#313131″]观看下面的视频[/penci_button]
在这里你可以看到更多新的和更新的音乐: 查看更多
与主题相关的图片 Nikon Z 85mm vs 105mm vs 70-200mm | Who WINS? – S CLASS Battle Royal | Matt Irwin
Nikon Z 85mm vs 105mm vs 70-200mm | Who WINS? – S CLASS Battle Royal | Matt Irwin
有关主题的信息 that’s why you go away
#85mm #105mm #70200mm
The Nikon Z mount lens range continues to grow, with one of the latest lenses to arrive being the MC 105 2.8 VR S. What a cracker it has turned out to be, but is it out classed?
PRE-ORDER YOUR CALENDAR HERE
Gear I love you might want to grab via affiliate link –
Nikon 105 Z MC 105 f/2.8 (Adorama) (Amazon)
Nikon 50 Z MC 50 f/2.8 (Adorama)
LowePro 450 II BackPack (Amazon)
Nikon
Nikon Z6 (Amazon)
Nikon Z6 II (Amazon)
Nikon Z7 (Amazon)
Nikon 14-24 2.8 S (Amazon)
Nikon 24-70 2.8 S (Amazon)
Nikon 70-200 2.8 S (Amazon)
Nikon 20mm 1.8 S (Amazon)
Nikon 35mm 1.8 S (Amazon)
Nikon 50mm 1.8 S (Amazon)
Nikon 50mm 1.2 S (Amazon)
Nikon 85 mm 1.8 S (Amazon)
Nikon 24-200 4- 6.3 VR (Amazon)
Peak Design
Anchor Links (Amazon)
Peak Design Capture Camera Clip V3 (Amazon)
Rode Audio
Rode Wireless GO II (Amazon)
Rode Video Mic NTG (Amazon)
CFexpress Type B
128GB From Pergear or Amazon
256GB From Pergear or Amazon
512GB From Pergear or Amazon
Check out my social media
INSTAGRAM
FACEBOOK
WEBSITE
TWITTER
>>https://hongkong.xemloibaihat.com/我们希望我们提供的信息对您非常重要。感谢您跟进此信息。
相关搜索 that’s why you go away.
#Nikon #85mm #105mm #70200mm #WINS #CLASS #Battle #Royal #Matt #Irwin
nikon,nikon z mount,z mount,nikon z mount lenses,best nikon z lenses,best portrait lens,best nikon portrait lens,Best z,70-200,85mm,105,105mm,mc 105mm,nikon z6ii,z6 ii,4k video,focus detect,focus check
Nikon Z 85mm vs 105mm vs 70-200mm | Who WINS? – S CLASS Battle Royal | Matt Irwin
that’s why you go away.
Can’t quite afford the 70-200 just yet, but the 105MC is on the way😊
I needed this review. I have the z24-70/f4, the z70-200/f2.8 and the z14-24/2.8. I feel I need a macro – and for sheer versatility the MC 105 S makes it so attractive. But now I'm wondering. I don't do portrait work, just Street and travel primary. lots of gardens with flowers. what do you think…maybe the 85mm is the better lens for my need. Great video. and very useful comparison.
I'm happy with my 85 + 24-200 + 50 MC + 50 F/1.8 + 14-30
LoCA comparison would have been interesting.
No wonder the 70-200 falls forward >> the supplied collar wasnt used and you have a Centre colum = less sharp images in my book ???
Is there a reason why they could only get f/2.8 out of a macro lens? If they put a bigger bit of glass on the front of the macro lens, would that not let more light in and have a better than 2.8 wide open aperture? 2.8 is supposed to be good (for a zoom) but a prime is good at 1.8 or even lower, like 1.4. Wouldn't a macro lens at 1.4 bet effectively letting way more light in than a 2.8? That would definitely be better.
Anyway, we don't have to worried too much, the 105mm has sold out because Nikon didn't order enough! So we have plenty of time to ponder in imponderable….
I have the 70-200 f2.8 and if the 105 is sharper I will get it too but I need a 100-400 and Z7 III first more
Just finishing processing the take from my first proper shoot with my new 105 up in London yesterday, street work rather than macro. I am blown away by the sharpness and the bokeh, and the ability to separate the subject that Matt has talked about previously. May struggle to prise it off my Z6 for a while!
Good comparison Matt. From personal experience I consider the trinity of f/2.8 S lenses "near prime" in quality. Your tests seem to confirm that on the 70-200mm and I believe it holds on the other two. The 105mm has a slight edge on sharpness in my experience as well but I've only been shooting it for a few weeks. The macro capability made it a must have for me.
I think we both see the same results.
Now I just need that Z 200-600mm and I'll be good to go!
20mm, 35mm, 50mm, 105mm
W
W
Went for all 3 , no regrets. Cheers for another great video Matt.
The 85 does not vignette like the other two also. But it does not get the love the other two get (I own the 85 and even I don't use it that often – maybe because I have that wonderful 105,, ART lens). I DO have the 105 on order. Might even get it before Christmas! 😀
But I think the main take away from this comparison – the camera and lens will do the job. The potential weak link is the person behind the lens.
All the way z 70-200, probably will get the 105 at some point though
Matt, I think you need to take pictures of a standard test format, where you see the possible differences much clearer. This is nice, but not very efficient! But keep going 🙂
I do already own the 70-200mm and the 85mm. Now I am waiting to get my hands on the 105mm when available again. So far I love all the Z-lenses and I will surely buy the 100-400mm and the 1.2/85mm. If I had to chose I would go for the 70-200mm as a mainly portrait photographer but that beast is quite heavy. Nothing to carry around for longer hikes.
This was a great comparison. I did wish that you did more of a portrait comparison comparing bokeh (day and night). Is it possible you could make another video with there 3 lenses for the portrait shooter? I know you are on lock down… but I can hope? I am waiting for 85 1.2 but while we wait it would be very helpful! Also did you notice much difference in chromatic aberration between all 3? Sounded like 85 had a bit of an issue?
Putting them side by side like that, the 70-200 image looks consistently better, but I can't quite tell why. The 105 is clean as hell compared to the F mount version, but I don't think it offers enough improvement to warrant the switch. I'm mildy disappointed they didn't go 1.4:1 like Canon.
I have the 70-200 and 85. They're both great.
Hello Matt, Nice to hear from you. Good test still waiting for my copy of the MC 105mm. I am so looking forward to it. Just as a side issue, I know the Z7ii is knot a pro camera but it seem to have a good strong body, as I have just done a drop test 4 feet on to concrete yard floor. Not a recommendation with my Z7ii with 24mm-70mm f2.8. 🙁 But they do bonce about six inches. Form first test all seem to be working? I do not wish you or any of your viewers to repeat this test. Keep well, keep safe and their is alway some one who it goes wrong for more then…
I have both the 85mm and the 70-200 and now waiting on both the 105 and 50 macro lenses. I love the 85, even though I rarely use it.
Have the Z 70-200mm, no plans to acquire the 105mm or the 85mm f/1.8. 85mm f/1.2 is a different story …
I was just looking for something like this. Thank you sir.
Honestly I'm thinking a future setup may involve all 3. I want a top notch macro lens for film scanning. I need a 70-200 for action, aircraft and cars driving. 85 1.8 for cars static- to just totally blow out the background when there's not as much space to have the 70-200 as far zoomed in as possible
Great work Matt, thanks. These new (sharper more capable) lenses are certainly driving me to want to buy into the Z platform…
I opted to get the 24-200 and now the 105. About same money as the 70-200, and lighter kit and much more versatility between the too lenses. Works great for me as I don't really need the 2.8 for the zoom. Really excited about the performance of the 105.
Great video as always! Want to upgrade the kit lens that was with my Nikon Z5 down the road! Not sure which direction I should go! I love shooting landscape or city scape images. Zoom or a prime lens. I did like your review in this video! I am interested in the 105mm for a prime. Zoom lens would be the 24-200mm.
70-200 mm it is!
Nice comparison. The 70 +200 is a really great lens. Ihe 105 is great but may not be worth having another lens unless a lot of macro work is done. For my use I think a couple of cheap extension tubes is lighter than another lens and I don't do enough macro work
I love an 85mm f/1.8. Best focal length ever.